Data v. Ghigo & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Data v. Ghigo & Co.

1943 OK 172, 137 P.2d 556, 192 Okla. 445, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 192

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 11, 1943·No. No. 30904.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against her and on December 2, 1942, filed her brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under the authority of Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d *446 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon ■which to sustain the action of the trial court.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment for the plaintiff and enter judgment for the defendant.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against her and on December 2, 1942, filed her brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under the authority of Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d *446 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon ■which to sustain the action of the trial court.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment for the plaintiff and enter judgment for the defendant.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Data v. Ghigo & Co., 1943 OK 172, 137 P.2d 556, 192 Okla. 445, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 192 (Okla. 1943).

Pincite

1943 OK 172 (Data v. Ghigo & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related