Anderson v. State ex rel. Burnett

1954 OK 206, 272 P.2d 405, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 577
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided July 7, 1954·No. No. 36224·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court and on December 28, 1953, filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendants in error have filed no brief and have offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okl. 273, 21 P.2d 1056, and Data v. Ghigo & Co., 192 Okl. 445, 137 P.2d 556, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court but the judgment may be reversed with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded with directions to the trial court to vacate the judgment entered against defendant and dismiss the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State ex rel. Burnett, 1954 OK 206, 272 P.2d 405, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 577 (Okla. 1954).

1954 OK 206 (Anderson v. State ex rel. Burnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Department of Public Safety v. Sampson
1970 OK 212 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1970)
Mulkey v. State
1970 OK 84 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1970)
Loveless v. Holloway
1959 OK 266 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1959)