Darley v. United States of America

• Court: District Court, S.D. New York
• Decided: January 28, 2022
• Docket: 7:22-cv-00714
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NICHOLAS DARLEY, Plaintiff, 1:22-CV-0714 (LTS) -against- ORDER DIRECTING PRISONER AUTHORIZATION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff, currently incarcerated in the Federal Correctional Institution in Otisville, New York, brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this court, a prisoner must either pay $402.00 in fees – a $350.00 filing fee plus a $52.00 administrative fee – or, to request permission to proceed without prepayment of fees, submit a completed and signed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application and a prisoner authorization. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. If the Court grants a prisoner’s IFP application, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the court to collect the $350.00 filing fee in installments deducted from the prisoner’s prison trust fund account. See § 1915(b)(1). A prisoner seeking to proceed in this court without prepayment of fees must therefore also authorize the court to withdraw these payments from his prison trust fund account by filing a “prisoner authorization,” which directs the facility where the prisoner is incarcerated to deduct the $350.00 filing fee1 from the prisoner’s prison trust fund account in installments and to send to this Court certified copies of the prisoner’s prison trust fund account statements for the past six months. See § 1915(a)(2), (b).

1 The $52.00 administrative fee for filing a federal civil action does not apply to persons granted IFP status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff submitted an IFP application, but did not submit a prisoner authorization. Within 30 days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $402.00 in fees or complete, sign, and submit the attached prisoner authorization. If Plaintiff submits the prisoner authorization, it should be labeled with docket number 1:22-CV-0714 (LTS).2

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, this action shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, this action will be dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 28, 2022 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

2 Plaintiff is cautioned that if a prisoner files a federal civil action or appeal that is dismissed as malicious, frivolous, or for failure to state a claim on which relief may granted, the dismissal is a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). A prisoner who receives three “strikes” cannot file federal civil actions IFP as a prisoner, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, and must pay the relevant fees at the time of filing any new federal civil action.