Darden v. Stokes

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Darden v. Stokes. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Tenn. App. LEXIS 274
Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided April 23, 1997·No. 01A01-9610-CH-00458·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

FILED

April 23, 1997

DORRIS M. DARDEN, )

) Cecil W. Crowson Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Appellate Court Clerk ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 95-417-III

VS. )

) Appeal No. ) 01A01-9610-CH-00458 BILLY J. STOKES, Commissioner ) of the Tennessee Department of ) Employment Security, and ) ALVIN C. YORK VETERANS ) MEDICAL CENTER, )

)

Defendants/Appellees. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur with the results of the court’s opinion. The administrative record contains substantial and material evidence supporting the Board of Review’s conclusions that Ms. Darden’s job did not cause her manic-depressive condition and, therefore, that Ms. Darden left her employment voluntarily and without good cause connected with the work.

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darden v. Stokes, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).

Darden v. Stokes (Darden v. Stokes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.