Darden v. Stokes
This text of Darden v. Stokes (Darden v. Stokes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE
FILED April 23, 1997 DORRIS M. DARDEN, ) ) Cecil W. Crowson Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Appellate Court Clerk ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 95-417-III VS. ) ) Appeal No. ) 01A01-9610-CH-00458 BILLY J. STOKES, Commissioner ) of the Tennessee Department of ) Employment Security, and ) ALVIN C. YORK VETERANS ) MEDICAL CENTER, ) ) Defendants/Appellees. )
CONCURRING OPINION
I concur with the results of the court’s opinion. The administrative record contains substantial and material evidence supporting the Board of Review’s conclusions that Ms. Darden’s job did not cause her manic-depressive condition and, therefore, that Ms. Darden left her employment voluntarily and without good cause connected with the work.
____________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Darden v. Stokes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darden-v-stokes-tennctapp-1997.