Danta Davis v. Dennis Straub, Warden

445 F.3d 908, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10028, 2006 WL 1042354
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2006·No. 03-2262·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

AMENDED ORDER

This matter comes before the court upon the petition for rehearing en bane, filed by counsel for the appellant, and the response of the appellee thereto. The petition has been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other judges of the court in regular active service, less than a majority of whom have voted in favor of rehearing en banc. Accordingly, the petition has been returned to the panel for decision.

Upon consideration of the petition and the response, the panel concludes that the issues raised therein were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case, and the request for rehearing is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Danta Davis v. Dennis Straub, Warden, 445 F.3d 908, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10028, 2006 WL 1042354 (6th Cir. 2006).

445 F.3d 908 (Danta Davis v. Dennis Straub, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayon v. Reardon
E.D. New York, 2021
Evans v. Thompson
518 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2008)
Foley v. Parker
Sixth Circuit, 2007
Danta Davis v. Dennis Straub, Warden
445 F.3d 908 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)