Home/Ninth Circuit/Danielson v. Flores

Danielson v. Flores

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Danielson v. Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 704 F.3d 1067 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2012·No. 11-55452·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: CESAR IVAN FLORES; ANA No. 11-55452 MARIA FLORES, Debtors. D.C. No. 6:10-29956-MJ ROD DANIELSON , Trustee-Appellant, ORDER v.

CESAR IVAN FLORES; ANA MARIA FLORES, Debtors-Appellees.

Filed December 19, 2012

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Danielson v. Flores, (9th Cir. 2012).

Danielson v. Flores (Danielson v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.