Danielson v. Flores
704 F.3d 1067, 486 B.R. 1279, 2012 WL 6618328, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25928
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 2012
Docket11-55452
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 704 F.3d 1067 (Danielson v. Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Danielson v. Flores, 704 F.3d 1067, 486 B.R. 1279, 2012 WL 6618328, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25928 (9th Cir. 2012).
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ana Flores v. Rod Danielson
Ninth Circuit, 2013
In re Ballew
487 B.R. 657 (E.D. North Carolina, 2013)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
704 F.3d 1067, 486 B.R. 1279, 2012 WL 6618328, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danielson-v-flores-ca9-2012.