Danielson v. Flores
704 F.3d 1067, 486 B.R. 1279, 2012 WL 6618328, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25928
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2012·No. 11-55452·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Danielson v. Flores, 704 F.3d 1067, 486 B.R. 1279, 2012 WL 6618328, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25928 (9th Cir. 2012).
704 F.3d 1067 (Danielson v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ana Flores v. Rod Danielson
Ninth Circuit, 2013
In re Ballew
487 B.R. 657 (E.D. North Carolina, 2013)