Daniels v. Lake Pleasant Land Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Daniels v. Lake Pleasant Land Co.

193 So. 2d 679

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 16, 1967

DocketNo. 221

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 193 So. 2d 679 (Daniels v. Lake Pleasant Land Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniels v. Lake Pleasant Land Co., 193 So. 2d 679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the trial court is generally presumed to be correct on appeal. This court is not authorized to interfere with the judgment of the trial court unless there is no substantial evidence to support the judgment.

It is unnecessary to recite or summarize the evidence contained in the record. Our review does not disclose that the learned chancellor misapprehended the legal effect of the evidence or that he applied incorrect principles of law to the facts. There was competent, substantial evidence to support his conclusions. Therefore, the decree is

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., ANDREWS, J., and ELMORE, FRANK H„ Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI