Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Daniels v. Lake Pleasant Land Co.

Daniels v. Lake Pleasant Land Co.

193 So. 2d 679
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 16, 1967·No. No. 221·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the trial court is generally presumed to be correct on appeal. This court is not authorized to interfere with the judgment of the trial court unless there is no substantial evidence to support the judgment.

It is unnecessary to recite or summarize the evidence contained in the record. Our review does not disclose that the learned chancellor misapprehended the legal effect of the evidence or that he applied incorrect principles of law to the facts. There was competent, substantial evidence to support his conclusions. Therefore, the decree is

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., ANDREWS, J., and ELMORE, FRANK H„ Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. Lake Pleasant Land Co., 193 So. 2d 679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

193 So. 2d 679 (Daniels v. Lake Pleasant Land Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sapp v. State
913 So. 2d 1220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Klinger v. Zaremba Florida Co.
502 So. 2d 1252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Wright v. State
348 So. 2d 26 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Weinstein v. State
269 So. 2d 70 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Tollius v. Dutch Inns of America, Inc.
244 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Coral Construction Corp. v. Arlt
208 So. 2d 482 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Getsie v. State
193 So. 2d 679 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)