Coral Construction Corp. v. Arlt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coral Construction Corp. v. Arlt

208 So. 2d 482, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5776

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 1968

DocketNo. 67-704

StatusPublished

This text of 208 So. 2d 482 (Coral Construction Corp. v. Arlt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coral Construction Corp. v. Arlt, 208 So. 2d 482, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5776 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following the decision of the supreme court, reported in Arlt v. Buchanan, Fla.1966, 190 So.2d 575, and this court’s mandate in response thereto, reported in Coral Construction Corp. v. Arlt, Fla.App. 1966, 191 So.2d 94, this cause came on for final hearing before the circuit judge and resulted in the entry of a judgment or decree in favor of the plaintiff in the trial court.

The defendant appeals and contends that the final judgment or decree under review is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. An examination of the record indicates that the plaintiff in the trial court carried her burden of proof in support of the cause of action pleaded and approved by the supreme court in Arlt v. Buchanan, supra.

Therefore, there being such in the record, this court is required to affirm the ruling of the circuit judge. Miami Beach First National Bank v. Shalleck, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 649; Goldstein v. Pettinger, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 740; Daniels v. Lake Pleasant Land Company, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 679.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI