Daniel Weisman, Etc. v. Robert E. Lee

908 F.2d 1090, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12275, 1990 WL 101577
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 1990
Docket90-1151
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 908 F.2d 1090 (Daniel Weisman, Etc. v. Robert E. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel Weisman, Etc. v. Robert E. Lee, 908 F.2d 1090, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12275, 1990 WL 101577 (1st Cir. 1990).

Opinions

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island. The issue presented for review is whether a benediction invoking a deity delivered by a member of the clergy at an annual public school graduation violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution as construed by the Supreme Court under the second prong of the Lemon test. See Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 612-13, 91 S.Ct. 2105, 2111-12, 29 L.Ed.2d 745 (1971). The district court held that it did. 728 F.Supp. 68 (D.R.I.1990).

We are in agreement with the sound and pellucid opinion of the district court and see no reason to elaborate further.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Hamilton County
891 F. Supp. 2d 870 (E.D. Tennessee, 2012)
Freedom from Religion Found., Inc. v. Hickenlooper
412 P.3d 392 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2012)
Rogers v. Mulholland
858 F. Supp. 2d 213 (D. Rhode Island, 2012)
Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Taggart
862 P.2d 1339 (Utah Supreme Court, 1993)
Harris v. Joint School District No. 241
821 F. Supp. 638 (D. Idaho, 1993)
United States v. Hector Gonzales Alvarado
977 F.2d 585 (Seventh Circuit, 1992)
Lee v. Weisman
505 U.S. 577 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Griffith v. Teran
794 F. Supp. 1054 (D. Kansas, 1992)
Brody v. Spang
957 F.2d 1108 (Third Circuit, 1992)
Kreisner v. City of San Diego, Cal.
788 F. Supp. 445 (S.D. California, 1991)
Schmidt v. Bishop
779 F. Supp. 321 (S.D. New York, 1991)
Duran by and Through Duran v. Nitsche
780 F. Supp. 1048 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1991)
Kendrick v. Sullivan
766 F. Supp. 1180 (District of Columbia, 1991)
Randall v. Pegan
765 F. Supp. 793 (W.D. New York, 1991)
Harris v. City of Zion
934 F.2d 141 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
908 F.2d 1090, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12275, 1990 WL 101577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-weisman-etc-v-robert-e-lee-ca1-1990.