Daniel v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Daniel v. State

131 S.E. 296, 34 Ga. App. 783, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 32

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 12, 1926

Docket16988

StatusPublished

This text of 131 S.E. 296 (Daniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. State, 131 S.E. 296, 34 Ga. App. 783, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 32 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. Alleged prejudicial remarks of the judge, during the trial of a ease, in the presence and hearing of the jury, are not ground for a new trial, unless a motion .to declare a mistrial on that ground was made and overruled. Harrison v. State, 20 Ga. App. 157 (6) (92 S. E. 970). Under this ruling and the facts of the instant case, ground 5 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial is without merit.

2. The remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial show no cause for a new trial, and the verdict is amply authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. B. T. Brocle, J. M. Lang, for plaintiff in error. G. G. Pittman, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI