Daniel v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Daniel v. State

118 S.E. 762, 30 Ga. App. 667, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 610

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 25, 1923

Docket14734

StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.E. 762 (Daniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. State, 118 S.E. 762, 30 Ga. App. 667, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 610 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyies, C. J.

1. The first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complains that the court erred in refusing to give a certain charge requested in writing. This ground, however, is too defective to be considered, as it is not shown in the ground, nor even alleged therein, that the requested charge was applicable to the facts of the case. Caswell v. State, 27 Ga. App. 76 (7) (107 S. E. 560).

2. The admission of evidence, as complained of in ground B of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, was not error for any reason assigned.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing the grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. B. G. Jenkins, Callaway & De Jarnette, for plaintiff in error. Doyle Campbell, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI