Daniel Siebert v. Richard F. Allen

480 F.3d 1089
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniel Siebert v. Richard F. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 455 F.3d 1269
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 25, 2008·No. 06-11841·Published

Opinion

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 06-11841 Feb. 25, 2008 ________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 01-02323-CV-IPJ-TMP

DANIEL SIEBERT,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD F. ALLEN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections,

Respondent-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _________________________ (February 25, 2008)

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This case comes to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United

States. See Allen v. Siebert, 552 U.S. ___, 128 S. Ct. 2 (2007), rev’g Siebert v.

Allen, 480 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir. 2007). In accordance therewith, we hereby

AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of Siebert’s federal habeas petition as being

untimely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Siebert v. Richard F. Allen, 480 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir. 2008).

480 F.3d 1089 (Daniel Siebert v. Richard F. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. Siebert
552 U.S. 3 (Supreme Court, 2007)