Daniel Siebert v. Richard F. Allen

480 F.3d 1089
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 7, 2008
Docket06-11841
StatusPublished

This text of 480 F.3d 1089 (Daniel Siebert v. Richard F. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel Siebert v. Richard F. Allen, 480 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ____________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 06-11841 JAN 07 2008 ____________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK DANIEL SIEBERT,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD F. ALLEN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections,

Respondent-Appellee.

------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama -------------------------------------

Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R:

Based upon our review of Petitioner-Appellant’s Motion for Clarification filed

January 4, 2008, and given that jurisdiction over this case remains with the United States

Supreme Court until rehearing is resolved and their final judgment issues, we vacate this

Court’s December 21, 2007 opinion on remand from the Supreme Court of the United

States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
480 F.3d 1089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-siebert-v-richard-f-allen-ca11-2008.