Daniel Siebert v. Richard F. Allen

480 F.3d 1089
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniel Siebert v. Richard F. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 480 F.3d 1089
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 7, 2008·No. 06-11841·Published

Opinion

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FILED

____________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11841 JAN 07 2008 ____________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK

DANIEL SIEBERT,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD F. ALLEN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections,

Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama -------------------------------------

Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges. O R D E R:

Based upon our review of Petitioner-Appellant’s Motion for Clarification filed January 4, 2008, and given that jurisdiction over this case remains with the United States Supreme Court until rehearing is resolved and their final judgment issues, we vacate this Court’s December 21, 2007 opinion on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Siebert v. Richard F. Allen, 480 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir. 2008).

480 F.3d 1089 (Daniel Siebert v. Richard F. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.