Daniel Shoemaker v. State of Texas for the Protection of C.L.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 18, 2015·No. 01-15-00371-CV·Published

Opinion

FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/18/2015 11:21:31 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE APPENDIX A Clerk Cause No. C-1-CV-14-010087 ~ / L E DF O R R " C Q R C STATE O F TEXAS FOR T H E PROTECTION O F

Camille Latour. Applicant

vs.

Daniel Stioemaker. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS Respondent (DOB: 05/12/70) PROTECTIVE ORDER 9 6 O n *hi8 d a y ame to b e heard this Application for a Protective Order, pursuant to a n d in accordance with: [ « ^ Chapter 7 Aofthe T e x a s C o d e ofCriminal Procedure, or [ ] Chapter 8 5 o fthe T e x a s Family Code.

I. APPEARANCES Applicant appeared in person and through the State's attorney and announced ready. , [ v } ^ R e s p o n d e n t appeared in person and b y and through counsel ( f ^ j t f ^ f f ^ QiOCA. ) and announced ready. [ ] R e s p o n d e n t appeared pro s ea n d a n n o u n c e d ready. [ ] R e s p o n d e n t failed t o appear, although duly served with citation and notice.

II. FINDINGS T h e C o u r t , h a v i n g c o n s i d e r e d a l l pleadings a n d h e a r d t h ee v i d e n c e a n d a r g u m e n t o f c o u n s e l , finds that all n e c e s s a r y prerequisites o f t h e l a wh a v e been legally satisfied pursuant t o Title I V ,o f t h e T e x a s F a m i l y C o d e a n d that the C o u r t h a s jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter o f this c a u se. [ ] T h e making o fa record o ftestimony w a s waived. {y/\ r e c o r d o f t e s t i m o n y w a s m a d e . T h e C o u r t finds that a protective order is in t h e best interest o f t h e Applicant, t h efamily o r h o u s e h o l d , a n d t h e C o u r t further finds that: [ ] T h e parties h a v e agreed t o the following protective orders. [ ] F a m i l y V i o l e n c e h a s occurred a n d is likely t o occur in the future. [ ] R e s p o n d e n t c a u s e d serious bodily injury t o the Applicant o r a m e m b e r o f the Applicant's family o r household. [ ] Respondent w a st h e subject o f t w o or m o r e previous protective orders rendered to protect the Applicant after a finding b y the Court that t h eRespondent committed family violence a n d is likely t o c o m m i t family violence in the future. [ ] T h e r e w a s a previous protective order, which h a s expired, and t h eR e s p o n d e n t violated t h e p r e v i o u s p r o t e c t i v e o r d e r b y c o m m i t t i n g a n a c tp r o h i b i t e d b y t h e o r d e r w h i l e it w a s i n e f f e c t . [ ] . R e a s o n a b l e grounds exist t o believe Applicant has been the victim o f a sexual assault. [,/f R e a s o n a b l e grounds exist t o believe Applicant has been the victim o f stalking.

III. ORDERS T h e R e s p o n d e n t is O R D E R E D , D I R E C T E D a n d C O M M A N D E D : (A) T orefrain from committing acts of family violence against the Applicant o r a n y m e m b e r o f the Applicant's family o r household (including acts intended t o result in physical h a r m , bodily injury, assault o r s e x u a l assault, o r threats r e a s o n a b l y placing a m e m b e r in fear o f physical h a r m , bodily injury, assault o r sexual assault), and not t o u s e a n y force that would cause injury t othe Applicant. (B) Not t ocommunicate nor attempt t ocommunicate with the Applicant o ra n y m e m b e r o f the Applicant's family o r household ina threatening o r harassing manner. 1 D a n a D e B e a u v o i r , C o u n t y CleiK, T r a v i s C o u n t y , T e x a s , d o h e r e b y certify t i a t Ihis is a t m e a n d c o r o d c o p y a s s a m e a p p e a r s of record m m y o m c e . — W i t n e s s m y h a n d a n d s e a l o f office o n l^'ll'l^ [ w f ^ T h e Court finds that g o o d cause exists t oorder R e s p o n d e n t not t o c o m m u n i c a t e with Applicant.in a n y m a n n e r w h a t s o e v e r e x c e p t t h r o u g h a t t o r n e y s a n d it i ss o ordered. " H - t ^^\<»^ (C) Not t oc o m m u n i c a t e a threat nor attempt t ocommunicate a threat t othe Applicant o r a n y m e m b e r of the Applicant's family o rhousehold through any other person. (D) N o t t oe n g a g e i nc o n d u c t directed specifically t o w a r d t h e Applicant o ra n y m e m b e r o f the Applicant's family o r h o u s e h o l d , including following the person, that is r e a s o n a b l y likely t oharass, a n n o y , a l a r m , a b u s e , torment, o r e m b a r r a s s that person, a n d not t ostalk the Applicant, a sstalking is defined b y Section 42.072, Texas Penal Code. (E) N o t t o p o s s e s s a n y f i r e a r m s o r a m m u n i t i o n , u n l e s s h e / s h e is a p e a c e officer, a s defined by Section 1.07, T e x a s P e n a l C o d e . (F) Not t o g o within 2 0 0 yards o f those persons o r locations listed o n this p a g e o r a n y location w h e r e he/she k n o w s the Applicant o r the persons listed b e l o w t o be, except w h e r e s u c h is necessary to attend court proceedings, or: [ ] .

Protected Person: Camille Latour DOB: 10/30/76

Residence: CONFIDNETIAL

T r a v i s C o u n t y . T e x a s , o ra n y s u b s e q u e n t r e s i d e n c e

Place of W o r k : Workplace - CONFIDENTIAL

T r a v i s C o u n t y . T e x a s , o ra n y s u b s e q u e n t workplace

Place of Work: Workplace - CONFIDENTIAL

T r a v i s C o u n t y , T e x a s , o ra n y s u b s e q u e n t workplace

Protected Person: DOB:

N a m e o f Facility: R e s i d e n c e / S c h o o l / D a v C a r e Facility

Location o f Facility: T r a v i s C o u n t y , T e x a s , o ra n y s u b s e q u e n t residence/school/dav c a r e facility

Protected Person: Marcellus Hartman D O B : 11/14/46

Relationship: Applicant's father

Location: CONFIDENTIAL Travis County. Texas, or any subsequent residence/workplace

Protected Person: Beverly (AnvalGrossman DOB: 02/13/50

Relationship: Applicant's mother

Location: CONFIDENTIAL Blanco County, T e x a s , o ra n y subsequent residence/workplace

Pursuant to § 85.007 of t h eTexas ^JJ''^ Cpde^the^ourt^igrants Applicant's request f o r exclusion o f t h eaddress o f y«i8yher/n8Wenca a r x i p t a c o ^ employment, a n dt h e oMdrew's eaheelo a n d child o o r o facilitioo f r o m this final Protective Order, a n d orders t h e clerk t o e x c l u d e a n y s u c h information i nthis order f r o m the public records o fthe Court a n d maintain a confidential record of same. D a n a DeBeauvoir, County C l e r K T r H v i s C ^ j n t y , T e l a s ^ d b Hereby «Htify t h a t this B a t r u e a n d a ^ d ^ p y a s L m e a p p e a r s rftBcord in m y c f f i * . m / h a n d a n d s e a l of oifice o n , a .) 9 • / 5r eauvoir, C o u n W O e i x Dana DeBeauvoir, C o u n J i ^ a a V ^

B y Deputy. (G) Respondent is ordered t op a y t h e s u m of^*ec!5o/$296.00 (money order only) t o t h e

Clerk o fthis Court, said s u m being t h ecosts o fservjpefthe actual costs o fcourt, t h e costs incurred b y t h e

clerk b u t n o tpaid b y Applicant, a n da l l other^fdes, c h a r g e s o re x p e n s e s incurred i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e

protective order. S a i d s u m i s o r d e r e d t^Aiepaid by at the

T r a v i s C o u n t y C o u r t h o u s e , C o u n j y ^ e r k Civil Division, 2 " " Floor, R m .2 2 2 , P .O .B o x1 4 9 3 2 5 , Austin,

T e x a s 7 8 7 1 4 - 9 3 2 5 , f o r whic[jJ«sfexecution l i e .

(H) R e s p o n d e n t i s o r d e r e d t o p a y n o m i n a l a t t o r n e y ' s f e e s i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 (money

order - dniy) , , b y, . t ot h e Travis,£o«nt7-Attom«iigOffice,

Protective O r d e r D i v i s i p r t ^ O . B o x 1748, Austin, T ^ c ^ t & > ^ 7 6 7 , for>^^^Cf^1etexecution lie.

( l ) V , .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Shoemaker v. State of Texas for the Protection of C.L., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Daniel Shoemaker v. State of Texas for the Protection of C.L. (Daniel Shoemaker v. State of Texas for the Protection of C.L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.