Daniel Shoemaker v. State of Texas for the Protection of C.L.
This text of Daniel Shoemaker v. State of Texas for the Protection of C.L. (Daniel Shoemaker v. State of Texas for the Protection of C.L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 01-15-00371-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/31/2015 3:41:06 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK
NO. 01-15-00371-CV
FILED IN IN THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS 7/31/2015 3:41:06 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
DANIEL SHOEMAKER Appellant V.
CAMILLE LATOUR Appellee
On Appeal From County Court at Law Number Four of Travis County Texas
FIRST UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF
CHRISTOPER BEAN & ASSOCIATES Attorney for Appellant
Brian Buster SBN: 24082757 Christopher Bean SBN: 24012263 1301 S IH-35 N, Suite 105 Austin, Texas 78741 TEL: (512)-916-9956 FAX: (512)-669-5282
TRAVIS COUNTY ATTORNEY Attorney for Appellee
Hilary L. Riley SBN: 24013404 P.O. Box 1748 Austin, Texas 78767 TEL: (512)-854-4163 FAX: (512)-854-9570 TO THE HONORABLE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS:
1. Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. §10.1 and TEX. R. APP. P. §38.6(d), the Appellant, Daniel
Shoemaker, files this Unopposed First Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief.
2. Appellant’s opening brief is currently due on August 5, 2015.
3. Counsel for Appellant requests a 30-day extension of time to file its brief, making the
brief due on September 4, 2015. This is the first request for an extension of time to file the
opening brief.
4. At this time, Counsel for Appellant is lacking many documents it needs as a result of
Appellant having to retain other Counsel in a criminal matter directly related to the civil
litigation that is being appealed in this Court. Said Counsel for the pending criminal matter is in
possession of the needed documents. Counsel for Appellant needs to have these documents
returned to them in order to write a fully developed brief. Counsel for Appellant seeks this
extension of time so that the proper materials may be acquired that will allow for the brief to
contain the information necessary to aid the Court in its analysis of the issues presented. This
request is not sought for delay but so that justice may be done.
5. The undersigned has conferred with opposing counsel, and she has indicated that she
does not oppose this motion.
6. All facts recited in this motion are within the personal knowledge of Counsel for
Appellant, therefore no verification is necessary under TEX. R. APP. P. §10.2
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
For the reasons set forth above, Appellant requests that this Court grant this Unopposed
First Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief and extend the Deadline for Filing the Appellant’s brief up to and including September 4, 2015. Appellant further requests that this
Court grant all other relief to which he may be justly entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Brian Buster Brian Buster State Bar No. 24082757 1301 S IH-35 N, Suite 105 Austin, TX 78741 TEL: (512)-916-9956 FAX: (512)-669-5282 brian@christopherbeanlaw.com
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I certify that I conferred with counsel for Appellee regarding this motion and that Appellee is not opposed to this motion.
/s/ Brian Buster Brian Buster
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on this 31 day of July , 2015, a true and correct copy of this motion was sent to opposing counsel in accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Shoemaker v. State of Texas for the Protection of C.L., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-shoemaker-v-state-of-texas-for-the-protection-of-cl-texapp-2015.