Daniel R. Wotman & Assocs., PLLC v. Chang

96 N.E.3d 218, 73 N.Y.S.3d 122, 31 N.Y.3d 944
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedApril 3, 2018
Docket2018–86
StatusPublished

This text of 96 N.E.3d 218 (Daniel R. Wotman & Assocs., PLLC v. Chang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel R. Wotman & Assocs., PLLC v. Chang, 96 N.E.3d 218, 73 N.Y.S.3d 122, 31 N.Y.3d 944 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant having previously moved for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the Appellate Division order from which leave to appeal is currently sought ( 29 N.Y.3d 1047, 56 N.Y.S.3d 509, 78 N.E.3d 1194 [2017] ); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the October 2017 stipulation, dismissed upon the ground that no appeal lies from the stipulation to discontinue the entire action without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniel R. Wotman & Associates v. Chang
78 N.E.3d 1194 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)
Green v. Martin
78 N.E.3d 1195 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 N.E.3d 218, 73 N.Y.S.3d 122, 31 N.Y.3d 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-r-wotman-assocs-pllc-v-chang-nycterr-2018.