Daniel R. Wotman & Assocs., PLLC v. Chang

96 N.E.3d 218, 73 N.Y.S.3d 122, 31 N.Y.3d 944
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided April 3, 2018·No. 2018–86·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant having previously moved for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the Appellate Division order from which leave to appeal is currently sought ( 29 N.Y.3d 1047, 56 N.Y.S.3d 509, 78 N.E.3d 1194 [2017] ); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the October 2017 stipulation, dismissed upon the ground that no appeal lies from the stipulation to discontinue the entire action without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel R. Wotman & Assocs., PLLC v. Chang, 96 N.E.3d 218, 73 N.Y.S.3d 122, 31 N.Y.3d 944 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).

96 N.E.3d 218 (Daniel R. Wotman & Assocs., PLLC v. Chang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniel R. Wotman & Associates v. Chang
78 N.E.3d 1194 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)
Green v. Martin
78 N.E.3d 1195 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)