Daniel R. Wotman & Associates v. Chang

78 N.E.3d 1194, 29 N.Y.3d 1047, 2017 NY Slip Op 78521, 56 N.Y.S.3d 509, 2017 WL 2802292, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 1759
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 2017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[1048] Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Feinman taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel R. Wotman & Associates v. Chang, 78 N.E.3d 1194, 29 N.Y.3d 1047, 2017 NY Slip Op 78521, 56 N.Y.S.3d 509, 2017 WL 2802292, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 1759 (N.Y. 2017).

78 N.E.3d 1194 (Daniel R. Wotman & Associates v. Chang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniel R. Wotman & Assocs., PLLC v. Chang
96 N.E.3d 218 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 2018)