Daniel Aguilar Cervantes v. Maria Isela Gonzalez
This text of Daniel Aguilar Cervantes v. Maria Isela Gonzalez (Daniel Aguilar Cervantes v. Maria Isela Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ February 25, 2021
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A21D0204. DANIEL AGUILAR CERVANTES v. MARIA ISELA GONZALEZ.
In this divorce case between Daniel A. Cervantez and Maria I. Gonzalez, Daniel filed for summary judgment on the issues of child support and the ownership of the parties’ marital residence. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to Daniel on the issue of child support but denied summary judgment to Daniel on the issue of the ownership of the marital residence. Daniel then filed this application for discretionary review, seeking to appeal the denial of summary judgment on the issue of the ownership of the marital residence. We lack jurisdiction. Daniel’s application purports to be from the grant of summary judgment on the child support issue. But, in actuality, Daniel is appealing the partial denial of his motion for summary judgment on the issue of the marital residence’s ownership. An order denying a motion for partial summary judgment is an interlocutory order and not a final judgment. See Sharpe’s Appliance Store, Inc. v. Anderson, 161 Ga. App. 112, 112 (289 SE2d 312) (1982); Rolleston v. Cherry, 233 Ga. App. 295, 296 (504 SE2d 504) (1998). Although Daniel did file a discretionary application pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35, which governs discretionary appeal procedures, that does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), including obtaining a certificate of immediate review. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832-833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996). Because Daniel failed to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), we are without jurisdiction to consider this application for discretionary review which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/25/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Aguilar Cervantes v. Maria Isela Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-aguilar-cervantes-v-maria-isela-gonzalez-gactapp-2021.