Dane v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

341 N.E.2d 254, 369 Mass. 966, 1976 Mass. LEXIS 1111
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 28, 1976·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In this appeal from a judgment denying the plaintiff’s application to vacate an arbitrator’s award and confirming that award, the plaintiff argues that the arbitrator exceeded his power and thus the [967] award should be vacated as provided in clause (3) of G. L. c. 251, § 12 (a). However, the plaintiff’s only contention that the arbitrator exceeded his power is in substance a claim that the arbitrator committed an error of law. The principle is well established in this Commonwealth that, in the absence of fraud, an arbitrator’s award will not be vacated because of an error of law. Trustees of the Boston & Me. Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transp. Authority, 363 Mass. 386, 390 (1973), and cases cited.

Philip J. Shine for the plaintiff. Edward J. McDonough for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dane v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 341 N.E.2d 254, 369 Mass. 966, 1976 Mass. LEXIS 1111 (Mass. 1976).

341 N.E.2d 254 (Dane v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conway v. CLC Bio, LLC
32 N.E.3d 330 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2015)
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Malacaria
662 N.E.2d 241 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1996)