Home/New York Court of Appeals/Dana v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.

Dana v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.

92 N.Y. 639, 1883 N.Y. LEXIS 212
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 24, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 92 N.Y. 639 (Dana v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dana v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co., 92 N.Y. 639, 1883 N.Y. LEXIS 212 (N.Y. 1883).

Opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 641

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 642 DANFORTH, J., reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur.

Judgment reversed. *Page 643

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Galeota v. United States Gypsum Co.
123 F.2d 947 (Second Circuit, 1941)
Dzkowski v. . Reynoldsville Carting Co.
110 N.E. 442 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Reinertsen v. Erie Railroad
142 A.D. 31 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
McCarthy v. . Pennsylvania R.R. Co.
81 N.E. 770 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Morrison v. San Pedro L. A. & S. L. R.
88 P. 998 (Utah Supreme Court, 1907)
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Dixon
194 U.S. 338 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Dowd v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.
63 N.E. 541 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Elliott
102 F. 96 (Eighth Circuit, 1900)
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Heck
50 N.E. 988 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1898)
Oregon Short Line & U. N. Ry. Co. v. Frost
74 F. 965 (Ninth Circuit, 1896)
Clyde v. Richmond & D. R. Co.
69 F. 673 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia, 1895)
Baltimore & O. R. v. Camp
65 F. 952 (Sixth Circuit, 1895)
Hankins v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.
37 N.E. 466 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
Hankins v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
142 N.Y. 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. v. Clark
57 F. 125 (Sixth Circuit, 1893)
Van Tassel v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
20 N.Y.S. 708 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1892)
Nary v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.
9 N.Y.S. 153 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Tierney v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
23 N.W. 229 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1885)
Peschel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
21 N.W. 269 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1885)
Ellis v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.
95 N.Y. 546 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 N.Y. 639, 1883 N.Y. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dana-v-new-york-central-and-hudson-river-railroad-co-ny-1883.