Home/Federal Circuit/Dana Innovations, D/B/A Sonance v. Speakercraft, Inc. And Edward Haase

Dana Innovations, D/B/A Sonance v. Speakercraft, Inc. And Edward Haase

99 F.3d 1158, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40727
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dana Innovations, D/B/A Sonance v. Speakercraft, Inc. And Edward Haase. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 F.3d 30 →
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 19, 1996·No. 11-1307·Unpublished

Opinion

99 F.3d 1158

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
DANA INNOVATIONS, d/b/a Sonance, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SPEAKERCRAFT, INC. and Edward Haase, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1472.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 19, 1996.

DCT

APPEAL REINSTATED.

ORDER

The order of dismissal and the mandate dated September 12, 1996 having been issued in error, the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the notice of appeal is REINSTATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dana Innovations, D/B/A Sonance v. Speakercraft, Inc. And Edward Haase, 99 F.3d 1158, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40727 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

99 F.3d 1158 (Dana Innovations, D/B/A Sonance v. Speakercraft, Inc. And Edward Haase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.