Home/Federal Circuit/Dana Innovations, D/B/A Sonance v. Speakercraft, Inc. And Edward Haase

Dana Innovations, D/B/A Sonance v. Speakercraft, Inc. And Edward Haase

106 F.3d 423, 1996 WL 673580
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dana Innovations, D/B/A Sonance v. Speakercraft, Inc. And Edward Haase. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 F.3d 30 →
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 12, 1996·No. 95-1472·Unpublished

Opinion

106 F.3d 423

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
DANA INNOVATIONS, d/b/a Sonance, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SPEAKERCRAFT, INC. and Edward Haase, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1472.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1996.

[OPINION AFTER REINSTATEMENT OF APPEAL 99 F.3D 1158].

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dana Innovations, D/B/A Sonance v. Speakercraft, Inc. And Edward Haase, 106 F.3d 423, 1996 WL 673580 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

106 F.3d 423 (Dana Innovations, D/B/A Sonance v. Speakercraft, Inc. And Edward Haase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.