Damon Alarm Corp. v. American District Telegraph Co.

304 F. Supp. 83, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10150
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedSeptember 16, 1969
DocketNo. 68 Civ. 2789
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 304 F. Supp. 83 (Damon Alarm Corp. v. American District Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Damon Alarm Corp. v. American District Telegraph Co., 304 F. Supp. 83, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10150 (S.D.N.Y. 1969).

Opinion

METZNER, District Judge:

Defendant Automatic Fire Alarm Company of Delaware moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the company went out of existence on April 26,1968 as the result of a statutory merger.

Service of the complaint was made here in New York after April 26, 1968 on Automatic Fire Alarm Company, the surviving corporation. Automatic Fire Alarm Company is a New York corporation. Fed.R.Civ.P. 17(b) provides that the capacity of a corporation to be sued shall be determined by the law of the state of incorporation. See Melrose Distillers, Inc. v. United States, 359 U.S. 271, 79 S.Ct. 763, 3 L.Ed.2d 800 (1959).

The Delaware law provides that when a merger becomes effective the separate existence of all corporations except the survivor shall cease to exist. 8 Del.C. § 259; Sevits v. McKiernan-Terry Corp., 264 F.Supp. 810 (S.D.N.Y.1966); Argenbright v. Phoenix Finance Co., 21 Del.Ch. 288, 187 A. 124 (1936). Consequently, the moving defendant no longer exists and the action cannot be maintained against it.

The case of Melrose Distillers, supra, relied on in opposition to this motion, is not apposite. The court there was dealing with the dissolution of a Delaware corporation and looked to the Delaware law applicable to such circumstances. The governing statute (8 Del.C. § 278) permitted suit within three years of dissolution. However, as indicated above, Delaware has a separate statute applicable to statutory mergers.

Motion granted. So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lionel D. Batty v. UCar International Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, 2019
Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor v. Alturas de Florida Development Corp.
132 P.R. Dec. 905 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1993)
Beals v. Washington International, Inc.
386 A.2d 1156 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1978)
Fehl v. S. W. C. Corp.
433 F. Supp. 939 (D. Delaware, 1977)
Paramount Warrior, Inc. v. Commissioner
1976 T.C. Memo. 400 (U.S. Tax Court, 1976)
Beam v. Monsanto Co., Inc.
414 F. Supp. 570 (W.D. Arkansas, 1976)
Johnson v. Helicopter & Airplane Services Corp.
404 F. Supp. 726 (D. Maryland, 1975)
Harvey B. Johnson v. Rac Corporation
491 F.2d 510 (Fourth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Caverly
302 F. Supp. 757 (D. North Dakota, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 F. Supp. 83, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damon-alarm-corp-v-american-district-telegraph-co-nysd-1969.