Dame v. Wood
This text of 66 A. 484 (Dame v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It can be found from the fact that a person fails to act because of a mistake of his counsel, that he was prevented from acting by accident, mistake, or misfortune (Grout v. Cole, 57 N. H. 547; Bolles v. Dalton, 59 N. H. 479, 480; Kelsea v. Manchester, 64 N. H. 570; Harvey v. Northwood, 65 N. H. 117; Cossar v. Truesdale, 69 N. H. 490; Parsons v. Durham, 70 N. H. 44; Gunnison v. Abbott, 73 N. H. 590, 592); so there was evidence to .sustain the court’s finding, which is the only question of law raised by the defendant’s exception.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 A. 484, 74 N.H. 212, 1907 N.H. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dame-v-wood-nh-1907.