Cossar v. Truesdale

45 A. 252, 69 N.H. 490
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Blodsett, C. J.

There was no legal error in permitting the appellees to file their declarations under the statute relating to appeals from commissioners (P. S., c. 198, s. 7), which authorizes the court, “ in cases of accident or mistake,” to “ allow the creditor to file his declaration or to amend it as in other civil actions.” *491 Parker’s Appeal, 15 N. H. 24, 26; Tilton v. Tilton, 35 N. H. 430, 433; Holt v. Smart, 46 N. H. 1; Hilton v. Olcott, 58 N. H. 598, 599; Cutts v. Cutts, 58 N. H. 602, 603; Bolles v. Dalton, 59 N. H. 479, 480; Kelsea v. Manchester, 64 N. H. 570.

Exception overruled.

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cossar v. Truesdale, 45 A. 252, 69 N.H. 490 (N.H. 1898).

45 A. 252 (Cossar v. Truesdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dame v. Wood
66 A. 484 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1907)