Cossar v. Truesdale
This text of 45 A. 252 (Cossar v. Truesdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no legal error in permitting the appellees to file their declarations under the statute relating to appeals from commissioners (P. S., c. 198, s. 7), which authorizes the court, “ in cases of accident or mistake,” to “ allow the creditor to file his declaration or to amend it as in other civil actions.” *491 Parker’s Appeal, 15 N. H. 24, 26; Tilton v. Tilton, 35 N. H. 430, 433; Holt v. Smart, 46 N. H. 1; Hilton v. Olcott, 58 N. H. 598, 599; Cutts v. Cutts, 58 N. H. 602, 603; Bolles v. Dalton, 59 N. H. 479, 480; Kelsea v. Manchester, 64 N. H. 570.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A. 252, 69 N.H. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cossar-v-truesdale-nh-1898.