Cossar v. Truesdale

45 A. 252, 69 N.H. 490
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 A. 252 (Cossar v. Truesdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cossar v. Truesdale, 45 A. 252, 69 N.H. 490 (N.H. 1898).

Opinion

Blodsett, C. J.

There was no legal error in permitting the appellees to file their declarations under the statute relating to appeals from commissioners (P. S., c. 198, s. 7), which authorizes the court, “ in cases of accident or mistake,” to “ allow the creditor to file his declaration or to amend it as in other civil actions.” *491 Parker’s Appeal, 15 N. H. 24, 26; Tilton v. Tilton, 35 N. H. 430, 433; Holt v. Smart, 46 N. H. 1; Hilton v. Olcott, 58 N. H. 598, 599; Cutts v. Cutts, 58 N. H. 602, 603; Bolles v. Dalton, 59 N. H. 479, 480; Kelsea v. Manchester, 64 N. H. 570.

Exception overruled.

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dame v. Wood
66 A. 484 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 A. 252, 69 N.H. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cossar-v-truesdale-nh-1898.