Dalton v. Bob Neill Pontiac, Inc.

476 F. Supp. 789, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10307
District Court, M.D. North Carolina·Decided August 20, 1979·No. 1:11-m-00053·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HIRAM H. WARD, District Judge.

The parties 1 have agreed that their above-entitled cases be tried by this Court, without a jury, on the pleadings, stipulated facts, and various exhibits. 2 This Memorandum Opinion shall include and constitute the findings of fact and conclusions of law mandated by Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

*791 On August 26,1976, plaintiff Joan Evans Dalton purchased a 1975 Pontiac Grand Safari automobile from defendant Bob Neill Pontiac, a company engaged in the retail sales of new and used cars. Dalton financed the automobile through the defendant, who thereafter transferred its interest to Forsyth Bank and Trust Company. 3 The defendant gave Dalton a copy of the car invoice on the day of the purchase. Part of the invoice showed the following:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dalton v. Bob Neill Pontiac, Inc., 476 F. Supp. 789, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10307 (M.D.N.C. 1979).

476 F. Supp. 789 (Dalton v. Bob Neill Pontiac, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Celona v. Equitable National Bank (In Re Celona)
90 B.R. 104 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1988)
Shipman v. North Carolina Private Protective Services Board
346 S.E.2d 295 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)
Dixey v. Idaho First National Bank
505 F. Supp. 846 (D. Idaho, 1981)
Dalton v. Bob Neill Pontiac, Inc
628 F.2d 1348 (Fourth Circuit, 1980)
Luczak v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
494 F. Supp. 210 (W.D. New York, 1980)