Dakes v. State

545 So. 2d 939, 1989 WL 59580
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 6, 1989
Docket88-2387
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 545 So. 2d 939 (Dakes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dakes v. State, 545 So. 2d 939, 1989 WL 59580 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

545 So.2d 939 (1989)

Willie Earl DAKES, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-2387.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 6, 1989.
Rehearing Denied July 28, 1989.

*940 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Joseph C. Brock, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jorge Espinosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

Willie Earl Dakes entered the storeroom of a retail store during business hours and placed several hundred dollars worth of merchandise in a shopping bag. At the time Dakes entered the storeroom, the door leading to the room was unlocked; however, on the door were posted two signs: "authorized personnel only" and "associates only." Dakes was apprehended immediately upon leaving the store and was charged and convicted of burglary of an occupied structure in violation of section 810.02, Florida Statutes (1987), and petit theft. Dakes urges reversal of his burglary conviction because section 810.02(1) specifically exempts from its purview premises which are open to the public at the time the offense is committed. We hold that although the store itself was open to the public, the closed storeroom to which access was clearly restricted was not part of the premises open to the public, within the scope of section 810.02. See Downer v. State, 375 So.2d 840 (Fla. 1979). Thus, we affirm Dakes' conviction.

The record reflects that the storeroom which Dakes burglarized was unoccupied: the store detectives who observed Dakes take the merchandise were in an adjacent stockroom. When the trial court denied Dakes' motion for judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the jury verdict but corrected the judgment to reflect that the structure was unoccupied, it erroneously classified Dakes' crime as burglary of an unoccupied dwelling, a second degree felony. A retail store is not a dwelling. § 810.011(2), Fla. Stat. (1987). Section 810.02(3), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that burglary of an unoccupied structure which is not a dwelling is a felony of the third degree. Thus, Dakes' sentence was based on an incorrect scoresheet. We therefore remand to the trial court with directions to correct the scoresheet and to resentence Dakes.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Philip G. Cappello v. State
199 So. 3d 1113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
State v. O'Connor
326 P.3d 1064 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2014)
Roberts v. State
56 So. 3d 877 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Davis v. State
988 So. 2d 1125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Knight v. State
983 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Lewis v. State
841 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Gruver v. State
816 So. 2d 835 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Erts v. State
791 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cobb v. State
783 So. 2d 1154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Johnson v. State
786 So. 2d 1162 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Millian v. State
758 So. 2d 1271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Fine v. State
758 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Busby v. State
766 So. 2d 259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Thomas v. State
742 So. 2d 326 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Johnson v. State
737 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Walker v. State
661 So. 2d 98 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Goodloe v. State
656 So. 2d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
State v. Thomson
861 P.2d 492 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1993)
Pittman v. State
572 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
State v. Williams
547 So. 2d 347 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
545 So. 2d 939, 1989 WL 59580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dakes-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.