Daigle v. Mata

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Daigle v. Mata

532 So. 2d 1387, 1988 La. LEXIS 2538, 1988 WL 120097

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 11, 1988

DocketNo. 88-C-2143

StatusPublished

This text of 532 So. 2d 1387 (Daigle v. Mata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daigle v. Mata, 532 So. 2d 1387, 1988 La. LEXIS 2538, 1988 WL 120097 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Daigle, Virginia Wilson; —Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number 88-CA-0083; Parish of Jefferson 24th Judicial District Court Div. “G” Number 323-816.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., concurs in the denial. See Cavalier v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 530 So.2d 73 (La.1988). LEMMON, J., concurs. The court of appeal correctly ruled that the judgment was not a partial final judgment authorized by the Code of Civil Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Daigle, Virginia Wilson; —Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number 88-CA-0083; Parish of Jefferson 24th Judicial District Court Div. “G” Number 323-816.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., concurs in the denial. See Cavalier v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 530 So.2d 73 (La.1988). LEMMON, J., concurs. The court of appeal correctly ruled that the judgment was not a partial final judgment authorized by the Code of Civil Procedure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

532 So. 2d 1387, 1988 La. LEXIS 2538, 1988 WL 120097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daigle-v-mata-la-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack