Cavalier v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Cavalier v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.

530 So. 2d 73, 1988 La. LEXIS 1614, 1988 WL 91391

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 1, 1988

DocketNo. 88-C-2228

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 530 So. 2d 73 (Cavalier v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cavalier v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., 530 So. 2d 73, 1988 La. LEXIS 1614, 1988 WL 91391 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re National Union Fire Ins. Pitts.;— Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiora-ri and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 88-CA-0085; Parish of St. James, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 18061.

Prior report: La.App., 528 So.2d 1038.

Granted and remanded. Judgment of the court of appeal is affirmed insofar as it reversed the trial court’s finding that National Union Fire Insurance Co. provides primary UM coverage and INA provides excess UM coverage; however, the judgment is reversed insofar as it makes findings on the validity of rejections of UM coverage and releases Farm Bureau from the suit on the basis of those findings. Case remanded to the trial court for a full trial on the merits involving all three insurers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re National Union Fire Ins. Pitts.;— Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiora-ri and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 88-CA-0085; Parish of St. James, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 18061.

Prior report: La.App., 528 So.2d 1038.

Granted and remanded. Judgment of the court of appeal is affirmed insofar as it reversed the trial court’s finding that National Union Fire Insurance Co. provides primary UM coverage and INA provides excess UM coverage; however, the judgment is reversed insofar as it makes findings on the validity of rejections of UM coverage and releases Farm Bureau from the suit on the basis of those findings. Case remanded to the trial court for a full trial on the merits involving all three insurers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

530 So. 2d 73, 1988 La. LEXIS 1614, 1988 WL 91391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavalier-v-louisiana-farm-bureau-casualty-insurance-co-la-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack