Dahly v. Auxer
This text of 122 N.W. 1135 (Dahly v. Auxer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This record raises no questions which require extended consideration by this court. The respondent was injured while in the employ of the defendant, working in and about a mangle. In an action for damages she recovered a verdict for $1,500, and the appeal is from an order denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial. The record contains no prejudicial error.
The case is affirmed upon the authority of Cody v. Longyear, 103 Minn. 116, 114 N. W. 735; Dizonno v. Great Northern Ry. Co. 103 Minn. 120, 123, 114 N. W. 736; Lohman v. Swift & Co., 105 Minn. 148, 117 N. W. 418; Doerr v. Daily News Pub. Co., 97 Minn. 248, 106 N. W. 1044.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 N.W. 1135, 108 Minn. 531, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dahly-v-auxer-minn-1909.