Dahlstrom Metallic Door Co. v. Industrial Board
284 U.S. 594, 52 S. Ct. 202
Opinion
As this case is governed by principles set forth in New York Central R. Co. v. White, 243 U. S. 188, and Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington, 243 U. S. 219, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dahlstrom Metallic Door Co. v. Industrial Board, 284 U.S. 594, 52 S. Ct. 202 (1932).
284 U.S. 594 (Dahlstrom Metallic Door Co. v. Industrial Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Kaplan
89 Misc. 2d 610 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1977)
Porter v. Continental Bridge Co.
246 N.W.2d 244 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1976)
French v. County of Ingham
71 N.W.2d 244 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1955)
Matter of Rumsey Manufacturing Corp. (Corsi)
71 N.E.2d 426 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)
Gudmundson v. Cardillo
126 F.2d 521 (D.C. Circuit, 1942)
State v. Lone Star Gas Co.
129 S.W.2d 1164 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Iuppa & Battle Co. v. State Industrial Board
291 U.S. 646 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Miller Cabinet Co. v. State Industrial Board
291 U.S. 646 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Crowell v. Benson
285 U.S. 22 (Supreme Court, 1932)