D'Agostino v. Doorley

367 A.2d 704, 117 R.I. 463, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1712

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 17, 1977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court being equally divided, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.

John Quattrocchi, Jr., for plaintiffs. Louis A. Mascia, City Solicitor, V. Paul McGinn, Asst. City Solicitor, for defendants. Tillinghast, Collins & Graham, John J. Partridge, for Rhode Island Concrete Pipe Company and Edward C. Carmen, Jr. Inc.

Motion for reargument filed by plaintiffs is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Agostino v. Doorley, 367 A.2d 704, 117 R.I. 463, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1712 (R.I. 1977).

Pincite

367 A.2d 704 (D'Agostino v. Doorley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

D'AGOSTINO v. Doorley

375 A.2d 948 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1977)

Opinion

Related