Dade Roofing and Insulation Corp. v. Torres

369 So. 2d 98
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 1979
Docket78-557
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 369 So. 2d 98 (Dade Roofing and Insulation Corp. v. Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dade Roofing and Insulation Corp. v. Torres, 369 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

369 So.2d 98 (1979)

DADE ROOFING AND INSULATION CORP., a Florida Corporation, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
Guillermo TORRES, Appellee.
A-1-A Insulation, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 78-557.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 27, 1979.
Rehearing Denied April 20, 1979.

*99 Grable & Dieguez and Anthony Dieguez, Hialeah, for Dade.

Michael J. Fingar, North Miami Beach, for A-1-A and Torres.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Dade Roofing and Insulation Corp. appeals adverse summary final judgment entered in favor of Guillermo Torres. Cross-appellant A-1-A Insulation, Inc. appeals an adverse final judgment entered against it and in favor of appellant Dade Roofing and Insulation Corp., pursuant to a jury verdict in the amounts of $10,500.00 compensatory damages and $2,000.00 punitive damages.

Appellant's amended complaint alleged that A-1-A and its president Torres took and appropriated certain trucks and roofing equipment belonging to appellant and that they acted willfully and with malice. Compensatory and punitive damages were claimed.

It is appellant's contention on appeal that the trial court erred in entering summary final judgment in favor of Torres, inasmuch as, the evidence showed that he personally participated in the conversion of the trucks and roofing equipment.

We find merit in this contention and reverse the summary final judgment entered in favor of Torres. Individual officers and agents of a corporation are personally liable to any third person even if such acts are performed within the scope of their employment or as corporate officers or agents. Odell v. Signer, 169 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); CIC Leasing Corp. v. Dade Linen and Furniture Co., 279 So.2d 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

We have also considered the points raised by A-1-A in its cross-appeal and have found them to be without merit. Therefore, the summary final judgment in favor of Guillermo Torres is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceeding as to Torres. The judgment entered against A-1-A Insulation, Inc. is affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beaubien v. Cambridge Consol., Ltd.
652 So. 2d 936 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Scutieri v. Miller
605 So. 2d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Blits v. Blits
507 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Tourismart of America, Inc. v. Gonzalez
498 So. 2d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Littman v. Commercial Bank & Trust Company
425 So. 2d 636 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Leach v. Lewis
390 So. 2d 796 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Adams v. Brickell Townhouse, Inc.
388 So. 2d 1279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Bush v. Belenke
381 So. 2d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
369 So. 2d 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dade-roofing-and-insulation-corp-v-torres-fladistctapp-1979.