Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/DaCosta v. State

DaCosta v. State

842 So. 2d 935, 2003 WL 1046713
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 2003
Docket4D03-481
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 842 So. 2d 935 (DaCosta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DaCosta v. State, 842 So. 2d 935, 2003 WL 1046713 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

842 So.2d 935 (2003)

Mark Lee DACOSTA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D03-481.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 12, 2003.
Rehearing Denied April 30, 2003.

Mark Lee DaCosta, Punta Gorda, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's denial of relief, without prejudice to appellant presenting his gain-time challenge to the Department of Corrections. If appellant is not satisfied with the Department of Correction's ruling, then he can file a petition for writ of mandamus with the appropriate *936 circuit court. See Taylor v. State, 780 So.2d 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Black v. State, 771 So.2d 1231, 1232 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

FARMER, KLEIN, and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DaCosta v. State
876 So. 2d 1263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Bethel v. State
850 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
842 So. 2d 935, 2003 WL 1046713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dacosta-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.