Bethel v. State
850 So. 2d 597, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9400, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1483
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 2003·No. No. 4D03-2178·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), without prejudice to appellant’s right to present his gain-time challenge to the Department of Corrections first. If he is not satisfied after exhaustion of administrative remedies there, he can then file a petition for writ of mandamus with the appropriate circuit court. See Dacosta v. State, 842 So.2d 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bethel v. State, 850 So. 2d 597, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9400, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1483 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
850 So. 2d 597 (Bethel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Green v. State
850 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)