Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bethel v. State

Bethel v. State

850 So. 2d 597, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9400, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1483
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 25, 2003
DocketNo. 4D03-2178
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 850 So. 2d 597 (Bethel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bethel v. State, 850 So. 2d 597, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9400, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1483 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), without prejudice to appellant’s right to present his gain-time challenge to the Department of Corrections first. If he is not satisfied after exhaustion of administrative remedies there, he can then file a petition for writ of mandamus with the appropriate circuit court. See Dacosta v. State, 842 So.2d 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. State
850 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
850 So. 2d 597, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9400, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bethel-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.