Dacosta v. State
672 So. 2d 861, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339, 1996 WL 148855
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2253
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 672 So. 2d 861 (Dacosta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dacosta v. State, 672 So. 2d 861, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339, 1996 WL 148855 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
The convictions below are affirmed. See State v. Anderson, 537 So.2d 1373 (Fla.1989). As in Shepherd v. State, 661 So.2d 426, 426-27 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), however:
Because the sentence included the three-year minimum mandatory provision required by section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1993), it was error, as the state concedes, for the guidelines scoresheet to include an 18 point addition for “possession of a firearm.” Section 921.0014, Florida Statutes (1993) specifically provides that the additional sentence points for carrying a firearm may be imposed only for felonies “other than those enumerated in s. 775.087(2).” Accordingly, the sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing upon a properly calculated scoresheet which shall not include the points in question.
See Palmer v. State, 667 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Davis v. State
691 So. 2d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Shabazz v. State
674 So. 2d 920 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
672 So. 2d 861, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339, 1996 WL 148855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dacosta-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.