Shepherd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shepherd v. State

652 So. 2d 519, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3522, 1995 WL 150294

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1995

DocketNo. 95-148

StatusPublished

This text of 652 So. 2d 519 (Shepherd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shepherd v. State, 652 So. 2d 519, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3522, 1995 WL 150294 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in part the trial court’s order; however, because Exhibit 6A to the trial court’s order consists only of a cover page, we remand this cause for a proper attachment of a corrected Exhibit 6A, showing that appellant’s jail credit in case number CR 93-2726 has been corrected to give appellant the proper credit of 72 days jail time. See, e.g., Fisher v. State, 583 So.2d 421 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

[520]*520AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED for further proceedings.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in part the trial court’s order; however, because Exhibit 6A to the trial court’s order consists only of a cover page, we remand this cause for a proper attachment of a corrected Exhibit 6A, showing that appellant’s jail credit in case number CR 93-2726 has been corrected to give appellant the proper credit of 72 days jail time. See, e.g., Fisher v. State, 583 So.2d 421 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

[520]*520AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED for further proceedings.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

652 So. 2d 519, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3522, 1995 WL 150294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shepherd-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack