D.A.B.E., Inc. v. Toledo-Lucas Cty. Bd. of Health
761 N.E.2d 44, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1426, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 73
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in D.A.B.E., Inc. v. Toledo-Lucas Cty. Bd. of Health. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Ohio St. 3d 250 →
Opinion
Certified State Law Question, No. 301CV7334. On motion for admission pro hoc vice of William B. Schultz and Carlos T. Angulo by Andrew K. Ranazzi et al. Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D.A.B.E., Inc. v. Toledo-Lucas Cty. Bd. of Health, 761 N.E.2d 44, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1426, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 73 (Ohio 2002).
761 N.E.2d 44 (D.A.B.E., Inc. v. Toledo-Lucas Cty. Bd. of Health) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.