Da Silva v. Musso
76 N.Y.2d 959
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur dismissed as untimely (22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]; see, Drzewinski v Atlantic Scaffold & Ladder Co., 70 NY2d 999). [See, 76 NY2d 436.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Da Silva v. Musso, 76 N.Y.2d 959 (N.Y. 1990).
76 N.Y.2d 959 (Da Silva v. Musso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grunfeld v. Grunfeld
756 N.E.2d 75 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF ATLANTIC BEACH v. Hempstead
93 N.Y.2d 917 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
Incorporated Village of Atlantic Beach v. Town of Hempstead
713 N.E.2d 415 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
DaSilva v. Suozzi, English, Cianciulli & Peirez, P. C.
165 Misc. 2d 792 (New York Supreme Court, 1995)