Grunfeld v. Grunfeld

756 N.E.2d 75, 96 N.Y.2d 894, 730 N.Y.S.2d 787, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 2014
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 10, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 756 N.E.2d 75 (Grunfeld v. Grunfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grunfeld v. Grunfeld, 756 N.E.2d 75, 96 N.Y.2d 894, 730 N.Y.S.2d 787, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 2014 (N.Y. 2001).

Opinion

Motion to amend and/or clarify remittitur dismissed as untimely (see, 22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]; Incorporated Vil. of Atl. Beach v Town of Hempstead, 93 NY2d 917; Da Silva v Musso, 76 NY2d 959) [see, 94 NY2d 696].

Chief Judge Kaye taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grunfeld v. Grunfeld
731 N.E.2d 142 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
Da Silva v. Musso
76 N.Y.2d 959 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
Incorporated Village of Atlantic Beach v. Town of Hempstead
713 N.E.2d 415 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
756 N.E.2d 75, 96 N.Y.2d 894, 730 N.Y.S.2d 787, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 2014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grunfeld-v-grunfeld-ny-2001.