D. B. v. State

689 So. 2d 420, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2336, 1997 WL 107241
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 1997
DocketNo. 96-1611
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 689 So. 2d 420 (D. B. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D. B. v. State, 689 So. 2d 420, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2336, 1997 WL 107241 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s decision, based on the evidence presented, finding that appellant committed the offense of battery. The restitution issue raised was not preserved for appeal because of the failure to object below. See Owens v. State, 679 So.2d 44 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The state concedes, however, that we must remand for the trial court to correct the written disposition order to reflect the trial court’s oral findings that appellant committed the offense of battery and not aggravated battery.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J.S. v. State
717 So. 2d 175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
F. H. v. State
699 So. 2d 350 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
689 So. 2d 420, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2336, 1997 WL 107241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-b-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.