D. B. v. State
This text of 689 So. 2d 420 (D. B. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s decision, based on the evidence presented, finding that appellant committed the offense of battery. The restitution issue raised was not preserved for appeal because of the failure to object below. See Owens v. State, 679 So.2d 44 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The state concedes, however, that we must remand for the trial court to correct the written disposition order to reflect the trial court’s oral findings that appellant committed the offense of battery and not aggravated battery.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 So. 2d 420, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2336, 1997 WL 107241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-b-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.