D. B. v. State
689 So. 2d 420, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2336, 1997 WL 107241
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 1997·No. No. 96-1611·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s decision, based on the evidence presented, finding that appellant committed the offense of battery. The restitution issue raised was not preserved for appeal because of the failure to object below. See Owens v. State, 679 So.2d 44 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The state concedes, however, that we must remand for the trial court to correct the written disposition order to reflect the trial court’s oral findings that appellant committed the offense of battery and not aggravated battery.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D. B. v. State, 689 So. 2d 420, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2336, 1997 WL 107241 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
689 So. 2d 420 (D. B. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J.S. v. State
717 So. 2d 175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
F. H. v. State
699 So. 2d 350 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)