Czekala-Chatham v. State ex rel. Hood

212 So. 3d 787, 2015 WL 10985104, 2015 Miss. LEXIS 114
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 24, 2015
DocketNo. 2014-CA-00008-SCT
StatusPublished

This text of 212 So. 3d 787 (Czekala-Chatham v. State ex rel. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Czekala-Chatham v. State ex rel. Hood, 212 So. 3d 787, 2015 WL 10985104, 2015 Miss. LEXIS 114 (Mich. 2015).

Opinions

EN BANC ORDER

JESS H. DICKINSON, Presiding Justice.

This matter comes before the En Banc Court after hearing oral argument in this case January 21, 2015. We note that cases currently pending before the United States Supreme Court may, or may not, assist this Court in deciding the issue before us. Both parties agreed that this matter should be stayed until an opinion issues from the United States Supreme Court. Having considered the arguments and briefing already presented, the Court has determined that, prior to issuing a stay, supplemental briefing would be helpful on the following question:

In light of Mississippi’s public policy of not allowing or recognizing a marriage between two persons of the same gender, what rational basis supports the interpretation or application of a law or constitutional provision so as to prohibit Mississippi courts from granting a divorce to a Mississippi resident who was lawfully married in another state to a person of the same gender?

It is therefore ORDERED: that the parties shall simultaneously file supple[788]*788mental briefs not tb exceed thirty pages within thirty days of the entry of this order.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jess H. Dickinson JESS H. DICKINSON, PRESIDING JUSTICE FOR THE COURT

TO AGREE: WALLER, C.J., DICKINSON and RANDOLPH, P.JJ., LAMAR, PIERCE AND COLEMAN, JJ. CHANDLER, J., OBJECTS WITH SEPARATE WRITTEN STATEMENT. KING, J., OBJECTS WITH SEPARATE WRITTEN STATEMENT JOINED BY KITCHENS, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. North Carolina
317 U.S. 287 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Loving v. Virginia
388 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Frontiero v. Richardson
411 U.S. 677 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Hicks v. Miranda
422 U.S. 332 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia
427 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Mathews v. Lucas
427 U.S. 495 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan
458 U.S. 718 (Supreme Court, 1982)
City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
473 U.S. 432 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Turner v. Safley
482 U.S. 78 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Romer v. Evans
517 U.S. 620 (Supreme Court, 1996)
Lawrence v. Texas
539 U.S. 558 (Supreme Court, 2003)
United States v. Windsor
133 S. Ct. 2675 (Supreme Court, 2013)
Bowen v. Bowen
688 So. 2d 1374 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1997)
Loving v. Commonwealth
147 S.E.2d 78 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1966)
Jones v. Lorenzen
1965 OK 185 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1965)
Naim v. Naim
87 S.E.2d 749 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1955)
White v. Thompson
569 So. 2d 1181 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1990)
George v. George
389 So. 2d 1389 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1980)
Baker v. Nelson
191 N.W.2d 185 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1971)
State v. Brown
108 So. 2d 233 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 So. 3d 787, 2015 WL 10985104, 2015 Miss. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/czekala-chatham-v-state-ex-rel-hood-miss-2015.