Cynthia Herdrich v. Lori Pegram, M.D., Carle Clinic Association, and Health Alliance Medical Plans, Incorporated

170 F.3d 683, 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2841, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3845, 1999 WL 124057
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided March 8, 1999·No. 97-1070·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

The case is before the court on a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc filed by the defendants-appellees. On consideration of the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc, a vote of the active members of the court was requested. A majority did not favor rehearing en bane. Chief Judge Posner and Circuit Judges Flaum, Easterbrook and Diane P. Wood voted to grant rehearing en banc. A majority of the judges on the original panel voted to deny rehearing en banc.

Accordingly, It Is Ordered that the aforesaid petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby, Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cynthia Herdrich v. Lori Pegram, M.D., Carle Clinic Association, and Health Alliance Medical Plans, Incorporated, 170 F.3d 683, 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2841, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3845, 1999 WL 124057 (7th Cir. 1999).

170 F.3d 683 (Cynthia Herdrich v. Lori Pegram, M.D., Carle Clinic Association, and Health Alliance Medical Plans, Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herdrich v. Pegram
6 F. App'x 480 (Seventh Circuit, 2001)
Jones v. U.S. Healthcare
282 A.D.2d 347 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Rivers v. Health Options Connect, Inc.
96 F. Supp. 2d 1370 (S.D. Florida, 2000)