Cynthia Herdrich v. Lori Pegram, M.D., Carle Clinic Association, and Health Alliance Medical Plans, Incorporated
This text of 170 F.3d 683 (Cynthia Herdrich v. Lori Pegram, M.D., Carle Clinic Association, and Health Alliance Medical Plans, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The case is before the court on a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc filed by the defendants-appellees. On consideration of the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc, a vote of the active members of the court was requested. A majority did not favor rehearing en bane. Chief Judge Posner and Circuit Judges Flaum, Easterbrook and Diane P. Wood voted to grant rehearing en banc. A majority of the judges on the original panel voted to deny rehearing en banc.
Accordingly, It Is Ordered that the aforesaid petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby, Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 F.3d 683, 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2841, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3845, 1999 WL 124057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cynthia-herdrich-v-lori-pegram-md-carle-clinic-association-and-health-ca7-1999.