Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Gonzalez

89 Ohio St. 3d 470
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 16, 2000·No. Nos. 00-412 and 00-413·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board. Respondent Gonzalez and respondent Stafford are hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs of these proceedings are taxed equally to each respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Gonzalez, 89 Ohio St. 3d 470 (Ohio 2000).

89 Ohio St. 3d 470 (Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Gonzalez
2014 Ohio 851 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Stafford
2011 Ohio 1484 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Stafford
2000 Ohio 221 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)