Cutsforth, Inc. v. Motivepower, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cutsforth, Inc. v. Motivepower, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 636 F. App'x 575
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 17, 2015·No. 15-1315·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CUTSFORTH, INC., Appellant

v.

MOTIVEPOWER, INC., Appellee ______________________

2015-1315 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013- 00270. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MATHIAS WETZSTEIN SAMUEL, Fish & Richardson P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT P. COURTNEY, CONRAD GOSEN.

JASON ALEXANDER ENGEL, K&L Gates LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT J. BARZ, ALAN L. BARRY, BENJAMIN EDWARD WEED. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cutsforth, Inc. v. Motivepower, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2015).

Cutsforth, Inc. v. Motivepower, Inc. (Cutsforth, Inc. v. Motivepower, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.