Cutsforth, Inc. v. Motivepower, Inc.
This text of Cutsforth, Inc. v. Motivepower, Inc. (Cutsforth, Inc. v. Motivepower, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CUTSFORTH, INC., Appellant
v.
MOTIVEPOWER, INC., Appellee ______________________
2015-1315 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013- 00270. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MATHIAS WETZSTEIN SAMUEL, Fish & Richardson P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT P. COURTNEY, CONRAD GOSEN.
JASON ALEXANDER ENGEL, K&L Gates LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT J. BARZ, ALAN L. BARRY, BENJAMIN EDWARD WEED. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cutsforth, Inc. v. Motivepower, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutsforth-inc-v-motivepower-inc-cafc-2015.