Cutler v. Konover

New York Court of Appeals

Cutler v. Konover

433 N.E.2d 1268, 55 N.Y.2d 891, 449 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3095

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 9, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 433 N.E.2d 1268 (Cutler v. Konover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cutler v. Konover, 433 N.E.2d 1268, 55 N.Y.2d 891, 449 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3095 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In our view, the weight of the credible evidence supports the critical factual finding of knowledge made by the Appellate Division. We would only add that, in the posture *893 in which this case comes to this court, there is an affirmed finding of fact that none of defendants’ activities contributed to plaintiff’s failure to obtain rezoning for her property. Inasmuch as this determination is supported by the record, our review is at an end. (NY Const, art VI, § 3, subd a; CPLR 5501, subd [b].)

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Judge Jones taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI