Cutfield v. Flood

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 329
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 1, 1726
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 329 (Cutfield v. Flood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cutfield v. Flood, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 329 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1726).

Opinion

On Motion this day made by Mr. Whitaker of the Complainants Council praying for a Referrence to the Master in Chancery to Settle the Accounts between the Complainant and Defendants.

Ordered that the Master of this Court do Examine what is due upon the Complainants Mortgage and do fully State and report the same to this Court without delay.

Intr.

J. Skene Register

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutfield-v-flood-ctchansc-1726.